<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: The Double Sell</title> <atom:link href="http://blog.bwagy.com/the-double-sell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://blog.bwagy.com/the-double-sell/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-double-sell</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 00:00:28 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Ben Young</title><link>http://blog.bwagy.com/the-double-sell/comment-page-1/#comment-3079</link> <dc:creator>Ben Young</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 22:06:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bwagy.com/?p=1848#comment-3079</guid> <description>@Miki Thanks for building on the conversation and you&#039;re right it is vertical integration! Looking at someone elses razor blade handle and delivering on that is a cunning way to gain market share.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Miki Thanks for building on the conversation and you&#8217;re right it is vertical integration! Looking at someone elses razor blade handle and delivering on that is a cunning way to gain market share.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Miki Szikszai</title><link>http://blog.bwagy.com/the-double-sell/comment-page-1/#comment-3076</link> <dc:creator>Miki Szikszai</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 17:01:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bwagy.com/?p=1848#comment-3076</guid> <description>This is the razor blade model.You sell the handle cheap and the blades expensively. There is a marketing trick in here - understanding the *perception* of value.Consumers buy the same blades over and over because they have bought the handle. If they stopped to think a minute they&#039;d realise they could easily (and cheaply) change to brand B but their need for convenience (and inherent resistance to change) means they keep buying Brand A.What you are talking about is vertical integration. Isn&#039;t a better model to look at someone else&#039;s razor blade handle that they have used to buy market share and add value to that? Then you can flex with the market rather than painting yourself into a corner. Game producers do this well producing the same franchise over multiple platforms. They learn to be agile and meet the same need irrespective of the core platform.M</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the razor blade model.</p><p>You sell the handle cheap and the blades expensively. There is a marketing trick in here &#8211; understanding the *perception* of value.</p><p>Consumers buy the same blades over and over because they have bought the handle. If they stopped to think a minute they&#8217;d realise they could easily (and cheaply) change to brand B but their need for convenience (and inherent resistance to change) means they keep buying Brand A.</p><p>What you are talking about is vertical integration. Isn&#8217;t a better model to look at someone else&#8217;s razor blade handle that they have used to buy market share and add value to that? Then you can flex with the market rather than painting yourself into a corner. Game producers do this well producing the same franchise over multiple platforms. They learn to be agile and meet the same need irrespective of the core platform.</p><p>M</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 1/9 queries in 0.003 seconds using disk
Object Caching 292/293 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via Rackspace Cloud Files: N/A

Served from: blog.bwagy.com @ 2012-02-12 12:23:58 -->
