<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Double Sell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.bwagy.com/the-double-sell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.bwagy.com/the-double-sell/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=the-double-sell</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 05:05:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Young</title>
		<link>http://blog.bwagy.com/the-double-sell/comment-page-1/#comment-3079</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 22:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bwagy.com/?p=1848#comment-3079</guid>
		<description>@Miki Thanks for building on the conversation and you&#039;re right it is vertical integration! Looking at someone elses razor blade handle and delivering on that is a cunning way to gain market share.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Miki Thanks for building on the conversation and you&#8217;re right it is vertical integration! Looking at someone elses razor blade handle and delivering on that is a cunning way to gain market share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miki Szikszai</title>
		<link>http://blog.bwagy.com/the-double-sell/comment-page-1/#comment-3076</link>
		<dc:creator>Miki Szikszai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 17:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bwagy.com/?p=1848#comment-3076</guid>
		<description>This is the razor blade model.
You sell the handle cheap and the blades expensively. There is a marketing trick in here - understanding the *perception* of value.
Consumers buy the same blades over and over because they have bought the handle. If they stopped to think a minute they&#039;d realise they could easily (and cheaply) change to brand B but their need for convenience (and inherent resistance to change) means they keep buying Brand A.
What you are talking about is vertical integration. Isn&#039;t a better model to look at someone else&#039;s razor blade handle that they have used to buy market share and add value to that? Then you can flex with the market rather than painting yourself into a corner. Game producers do this well producing the same franchise over multiple platforms. They learn to be agile and meet the same need irrespective of the core platform.
M</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the razor blade model.</p>
<p>You sell the handle cheap and the blades expensively. There is a marketing trick in here &#8211; understanding the *perception* of value.</p>
<p>Consumers buy the same blades over and over because they have bought the handle. If they stopped to think a minute they&#8217;d realise they could easily (and cheaply) change to brand B but their need for convenience (and inherent resistance to change) means they keep buying Brand A.</p>
<p>What you are talking about is vertical integration. Isn&#8217;t a better model to look at someone else&#8217;s razor blade handle that they have used to buy market share and add value to that? Then you can flex with the market rather than painting yourself into a corner. Game producers do this well producing the same franchise over multiple platforms. They learn to be agile and meet the same need irrespective of the core platform.</p>
<p>M</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
